S'abonner

Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study - 15/06/17

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30187-0 
Wendy Atkin, ProfPhD a, , Kate Wooldrage, MSc a, Amy Brenner, MSc a, Jessica Martin, MSc a, Urvi Shah, MSc a, Sajith Perera, MSc a, Fiona Lucas, PhD a, Jeremy P Brown, MSc a, Ines Kralj-Hans, PhD a, Paul Greliak, BA a, Kevin Pack, BSc a, Jill Wood, MPH a, Ann Thomson, MSc a, Andrew Veitch, MD b, Stephen W Duffy, ProfMSc c, Amanda J Cross, PhD a
a Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK 
b New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK 
c Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof Wendy Atkin, Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, London W2 1PG, UK Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London St Mary’s Campus London W2 1PG UK

Summary

Background

Removal of adenomas reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, the benefit of surveillance colonoscopy on colorectal cancer risk remains unclear. We examined heterogeneity in colorectal cancer incidence in intermediate-risk patients and the effect of surveillance on colorectal cancer incidence.

Methods

We did this retrospective, multicentre, cohort study using routine lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and pathology data from patients who, after baseline colonoscopy and polypectomy, were diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas mostly (>99%) between Jan 1, 1990, and Dec 31, 2010, at 17 hospitals in the UK. These patients are currently offered surveillance colonoscopy at intervals of 3 years. Patients were followed up through to Dec 31, 2014.We assessed the effect of surveillance on colorectal cancer incidence using Cox regression with adjustment for patient, procedural, and polyp characteristics. We defined lower-risk and higher-risk subgroups on the basis of polyp and procedural characteristics identified as colorectal cancer risk factors. We estimated colorectal cancer incidence and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) using as standard the general population of England in 2007. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN15213649.

Findings

253 798 patients who underwent colonic endoscopy were identified, of whom 11 944 with intermediate-risk adenomas were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 7·9 years (IQR 5·6–11·1), 210 colorectal cancers were diagnosed. 5019 (42%) patients did not attend surveillance and 6925 (58%) attended one or more surveillance visits. Compared to no surveillance, one or two surveillance visits were associated with a significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence rate (adjusted hazard ratio 0·57, 95% CI 0·40–0·80 for one visit; 0·51, 0·31–0·84 for two visits). Without surveillance, colorectal cancer incidence in patients with a suboptimal quality colonoscopy, proximal polyps, or a high-grade or large adenoma (≥20 mm) at baseline (8865 [74%] patients) was significantly higher than in the general population (SIR 1·30, 95% CI 1·06–1·57). By contrast, in patients without these features, colorectal cancer incidence was lower than that of the general population (SIR 0·51, 95% CI 0·29–0·84).

Interpretation

Colonoscopy surveillance benefits most patients with intermediate-risk adenomas. However, some patients are already at low risk after baseline colonoscopy and the value of surveillance for them is unclear.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment, Cancer Research UK.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2017  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 18 - N° 6

P. 823-834 - juin 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Histotype-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (ISG-STS 1001): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial
  • Alessandro Gronchi, Stefano Ferrari, Vittorio Quagliuolo, Javier Martin Broto, Antonio Lopez Pousa, Giovanni Grignani, Umberto Basso, Jean-Yves Blay, Oscar Tendero, Robert Diaz Beveridge, Virginia Ferraresi, Iwona Lugowska, Domenico Franco Merlo, Valeria Fontana, Emanuela Marchesi, Davide Maria Donati, Elena Palassini, Emanuela Palmerini, Rita De Sanctis, Carlo Morosi, Silvia Stacchiotti, Silvia Bagué, Jean Michelle Coindre, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Piero Picci, Paolo Bruzzi, Paolo Giovanni Casali
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas
  • Michael Weller, Martin van den Bent, Jörg C Tonn, Roger Stupp, Matthias Preusser, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal, Roger Henriksson, Emilie Le Rhun, Carmen Balana, Olivier Chinot, Martin Bendszus, Jaap C Reijneveld, Frederick Dhermain, Pim French, Christine Marosi, Colin Watts, Ingela Oberg, Geoffrey Pilkington, Brigitta G Baumert, Martin J B Taphoorn, Monika Hegi, Manfred Westphal, Guido Reifenberger, Riccardo Soffietti, Wolfgang Wick, European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) Task Force on Gliomas

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.