Shenfu injection for improving cellular immunity and clinical outcome in patients with sepsis or septic shock - 19/04/17
, Yiping Ye, MD d, Jian Zhang, MD a, Tianzheng Lou, MD aAbstract |
Purpose |
To assess the efficacy of Shenfu injection (SFI) for enhancing cellular immunity and improving the clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock.
Methods |
Patients with sepsis were randomly assigned to receive either SFI at a dose of 100mL every 24hours for 7 consecutive days or a placebo in addition to conventional therapy. The immunologic parameters were collected on days 1, 3, and 7 after the above treatments, and the clinical outcomes were updated for 28days.
Results |
Of these160 patients, 3 were excluded from the analysis due to protocol violation and withdrawal of consent; thus, 157 completed the study (78 in the SFI group and 79 in the placebo group). We found that SFI increased both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood and up-regulated HLA-DR expression in monocytes (P<.05). Furthermore, SFI was also found to restore ex vivo monocytic tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 proinflammatory cytokine release in response to the endotoxin (P<.05). Importantly, the SFI group showed better clinical outcomes than did the placebo group in terms of the duration of vasopressor use (P=.008), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P=.034), Marshall score (P=.01), and length of intensive care unit stay (10.5±3.2 vs 12.2±2.8days; P=.012). However, the 28-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the SFI (20.5%; 16/78) and placebo groups (27.8%; −22/79; P=.28).
Conclusion |
These findings suggest that SFI can enhance the cellular immunity of patients with septic shock and could be a promising adjunctive treatment for patients with septic shock.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | Financial support: None. |
| ☆☆ | Funding: The current study was supported by the Seed Foundation of the Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences (key project) (Grant No.: HMSF-16-21-026). |
| ★ | Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. |
Vol 35 - N° 1
P. 1-6 - janvier 2017 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
