S'abonner

At-Risk Screened Children with Celiac Disease are Comparable in Disease Severity and Dietary Adherence to Those Found because of Clinical Suspicion: A Large Cohort Study - 18/04/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.12.077 
Laura Kivelä, MD 1, Katri Kaukinen, MD, PhD 2, 3, Heini Huhtala, MSc 4, Marja-Leena Lähdeaho, MD, PhD 1, Markku Mäki, MD, PhD 1, Kalle Kurppa, MD, PhD 1, *
1 Tampere Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland 
2 School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland 
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland 
4 Tampere School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland 

*Reprint requests: Tampere Center for Child Health Research, Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Lääkärinkatu 1, Tampere FI-33014, Finland.Tampere Center for Child Health ResearchTampere University HospitalUniversity of TampereLääkärinkatu 1TampereFI-33014Finland

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether children at risk for celiac disease should be screened systematically by comparing their baseline and follow-up characteristics to patients detected because of clinical suspicion.

Study design

Five hundred four children with celiac disease were divided into screen-detected (n = 145) and clinically detected cohorts (n = 359). The groups were compared for clinical, serologic, and histologic characteristics and laboratory values. Follow-up data regarding adherence and response to gluten-free diet were compared. Subgroup analyses were made between asymptomatic and symptomatic screen-detected patients.

Results

Of screen-detected patients, 51.8% had symptoms at diagnosis, although these were milder than in clinically detected children (P < .001). Anemia (7.1% vs 22.9%, P < .001) and poor growth (15.7% vs 36.9%, P < .001) were more common, and hemoglobin (126 g/l vs 124 g/l, P = .008) and albumin (41.0 g/l vs 38.0 g/l, P = .016) were lower in clinically detected patients. There were no differences in serology or histology between the groups. Screen-detected children had better dietary adherence (91.2% vs 83.2%, P = .047). The groups showed equal clinical response (97.5% vs 96.2%, P = .766) to the gluten-free diet. In subgroup analysis among screen-detected children, asymptomatic patients were older than symptomatic (9.0  vs 5.8 years of age, P = .007), but the groups were comparable in other variables.

Conclusions

More than one-half of the screen-detected patients with celiac disease had symptoms unrecognized at diagnosis. The severity of histologic damage, antibody levels, dietary adherence, and response to treatment in screen-detected cases is comparable with those detected on a clinical basis. The results support active screening for celiac disease among at-risk children.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : clinical presentation, screening, symptoms, villous atrophy, celiac antibodies, follow-up, gluten-free diet

Abbreviations : EmA, Rf, T1DM, TG2ab


Plan


 Supported by The Academy of Finland Research Council for Health, the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Areas of Tampere University Hospital, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Mary and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation, the Foundation for Pediatric Research, the Finnish Medical Foundation and the Finnish Celiac Society. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 Portions of the study were presented at the 16th International Celiac Disease Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, June 21-24, 2015; and as a poster at the annual meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Athens, Greece, May 25-28, 2016.


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 183

P. 115 - avril 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics : Systemic Infection with Haemophilus Influenzae in Very Young Infants
  • Carlos A. Cuello-Garcia
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Do Children Just Grow Out of Irritable Bowel Syndrome?
  • Eleonora Giannetti, Marco Maglione, Elisa Sciorio, Vincenzo Coppola, Erasmo Miele, Annamaria Staiano

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.