S'abonner

Hospital-level variation and predictors of admission after ED visits for atrial fibrillation: 2006 to 2011 - 02/11/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.023 
Michelle P. Lin, MD, MPH, SM a, b, , Jiemin Ma, PhD, MHS b, Joel S. Weissman, PhD b, c, Kenneth R. Bernard, MD, MBA b, Jeremiah D. Schuur, MD, MHS b, c
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, 10 Nathan D. Perlman Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA 
c Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, 10 Nathan D. Perlman Place, New York, NY, 10003. Tel.: +1 949 891 1135; fax: +1 212 420 2863.Department of Emergency MedicineMount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital10 Nathan D. Perlman PlaceNew YorkNY10003

Abstract

Background

Outpatient management of atrial fibrillation can be a safe alternative to inpatient admission after emergency department (ED) visits. We aim to describe trends and predictors of hospital admission for atrial fibrillation and determine the variation in admission among US hospitals.

Methods

We analyzed ED visits and hospital admissions for adult patients with a principal diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006 to 2011. We identified patient and hospital characteristics associated with admission using hierarchical multivariate logistic regression. We analyzed admission rates overall and for patients at low risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc score 0). We compared hospital-level variance with residual variance to estimate the intraclass correlation in models with and without hospital characteristics.

Results

From 2006 to 2011, annual ED visits for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter increased by 30.9% and admission rates decreased from 69.7% to 67.4% (P= .02). Admission was associated with setting (metropolitan teaching vs nonmetropolitan, odds ratio = 1.93 [1.62-2.29]) and region (Northeast vs West, odds ratio = 2.09 [1.67-2.60]). Among patients with 0 CHA2DS2-VASc score, the national average admission rate was 46.4%. The intraclass correlation was 20.7% adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital clustering, and 19.2% after additionally adjusting for hospital variables.

Conclusions

From 2006 to 2011, ED visits for atrial fibrillation in the United States increased by almost a third, with a minimal change in ED admission rates. One-fifth of variation in admission rates is due to hospital site and not explained by hospital characteristics. Hospital-specific practice patterns may identify opportunities to increase outpatient management.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Funding: This research was supported through a research grant from the Massachusetts Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation (501c3).
☆☆ Disclosure: None.
 The original research in this manuscript was conducted while Drs Lin, Ma, and Bernard were at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA.
★★ Journal subject codes: health services; quality and outcomes; atrial fibrillation.
☆☆☆ Prior presentation: A preliminary analysis was presented at the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine's Annual Meeting in May 2014 and published as an abstract in Academic Emergency Medicine, Supplement April 2014.


© 2016  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 34 - N° 11

P. 2094-2100 - novembre 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The efficacy of transcutaneous cardiac pacing in ED
  • Firat Bektas, Secgin Soyuncu
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The role of prehospital advanced airway management on outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis
  • Seungmin Jeong, Ki Ok Ahn, Sang Do Shin

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.