S'abonner

Randomized trial of micafungin versus fluconazole as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients - 28/10/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.06.011 
Silvia Park a, Kihyun Kim a, Jun Ho Jang a, Seok Jin Kim a, Won Seog Kim a, Doo Ryeon Chung b, Cheol-In Kang b, Kyong Ran Peck b, Chul Won Jung a,
a Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University of School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea 
b Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University of School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea 

Corresponding author. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea. Fax: +82 2 3410 1754.Division of Hematology-OncologyDepartment of MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine81 Irwon-roGangnam-guSeoul135-710South Korea

Summary

Objectives

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality among recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although fluconazole is used widely as an antifungal prophylactic agent in these patients, it is not reliably effective against mold infection including invasive aspergillosis. Micafungin provides antifungal activity against Candida and Aspergillus species, and previous studies have demonstrated its efficacy when used as a prophylactic agent for fungal infection in neutropenic patients. Here, we evaluated and compared the incidence of proven or probable IFIs after antifungal prophylaxis using micafungin or fluconazole.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center, phase II study involving adult patients who received allogeneic or autologous HSCT. Patients were randomly assigned to micafungin or fluconazole arms in a ratio of 2:1, and the treatment was initiated within 24 h of HSCT and maintained for up to 21 days. The primary end point was the incidence of proven or probable IFIs during the 100 days after HSCT. The secondary end points were the incidence rates of possible, proven, or probable IFIs, need to change the antifungal agent before engraftment, IFI-related mortality, and survival within 100 days after transplantation.

Results

Between March 2010 and May 2015, a total of 257 patients were enrolled. After exclusion of seven patients who did not receive at least one dose of a study treatment, 250 patients (micafungin, n = 165; fluconazole, n = 85) were included in the analysis of clinical efficacy. The median age was 47 years (range, 20–64). Allogeneic and autologous transplantations were performed in 56.0% (n = 140) and 44.0% (n = 110) of the patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. Overall, the incidence of proven and probable IFIs within 100 days of HSCT was 7.6% (n = 19). The percentages of patients who experienced proven or probable IFIs did not differ significantly between the micafungin and fluconazole groups: 7.3% and 8.2%, respectively (p = 0.786). Thirteen patients in the micafungin arm (7.9%) and eight patients in the fluconazole arm (9.4%) needed a change in antifungal agent before engraftment (p = 0.824). Mortality within 100 days after HSCT did not differ significantly between groups: 9.1% vs 12.9% in the micafungin and fluconazole arms, respectively (p = 0.345).

Conclusion

Micafungin is comparable to fluconazole for the prevention of IFIs in HSCT recipients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Micafungin, Fluconazole, Invasive fungal infection, Prophylaxis, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation


Plan


© 2016  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 73 - N° 5

P. 496-505 - novembre 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Impact of liposomal amphotericin B therapy on chronic pulmonary aspergillosis
  • Pippa J. Newton, Chris Harris, Julie Morris, David W. Denning
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Severe respiratory disease with rhinovirus detection: Role of bacteria in the most severe cases
  • Georgina Armero, Cristian Launes, Lluïsa Hernández-Platero, Carme Alejandre, Carmen Muñoz-Almagro, Iolanda Jordan

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.