Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Review for Emergency Care Providers - 25/08/16
Abstract |
Periprosthetic joint infection is among the most common modes of failure of a total hip or knee arthroplasty and can be a common concern when patients present to the emergency department for care. The initial evaluation for periprosthetic joint infection includes a history and physical examination, followed by radiographs (to rule out other causes of pain or failure) and then serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein testing. If the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level are elevated or if the clinical suspicion for infection is high, the joint should be aspirated and the fluid sent for culture, as well as for a synovial WBC count and differential, with optimal threshold values of 3,000 WBC/μL and 80% polymorphonuclear cells, respectively. Recent work has shown that optimal cutoff values for patients presenting in the early postoperative period (within the first 6 weeks postoperatively) are different, with a C-reactive protein level greater than or near 100 mg/L (normal <10 mg/L), indicating the need for aspiration, with synovial fluid WBC thresholds of 10,000 WBC/μL and 90% polymorphonuclear cells. Antibiotics should not be administered before joint aspiration unless the patient has systemic signs of sepsis because even a single dose may cloud the interpretation of subsequent tests, including cultures taken from the joint. Furthermore, superficial cultures taken from wound drainage are discouraged because they can similarly cloud diagnosis and treatment. The rising prevalence of total joint arthroplasty makes proficiency in the assessment and early management of periprosthetic joint infection important for the emergency physician to optimize clinical outcomes.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Supervising editor: Gregory J. Moran, MD |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). Dr. Della Valle reports personal fees from DePuy, grants and personal fees from Smith & Nephew, grants from Stryker, research support, stock, and stock options from CD Diagnostics, and grants and personal fees from Zimmer-Biomet outside the submitted work; has a patent with Zimmer-Biomet with royalties paid; serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for the company that offers α-defensin testing commercially; and owns stock and options in that company. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
Continuing Medical Education exam for this article is available at ACEPeCME/. |
Vol 68 - N° 3
P. 324-334 - septembre 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?