S'abonner

Toxicity and quality of life after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial - 01/08/16

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30120-6 
Stephanie M de Boer, DrMD a, , Melanie E Powell, MD d, Linda Mileshkin, MD e, Dionyssios Katsaros, ProfMD f, Paul Bessette, ProfMD g, Christine Haie-Meder, MD h, Petronella B Ottevanger, MD i, Jonathan A Ledermann, ProfMD j, Pearly Khaw, MD k, Alessandro Colombo, MD l, Anthony Fyles, ProfMD m, Marie-Helene Baron, MD n, Henry C Kitchener, ProfMD o, Hans W Nijman, ProfPhD p, Roy F Kruitwagen, ProfPhD q, Remi A Nout, MD a, Karen W Verhoeven-Adema, PhD r, Vincent T Smit, ProfPhD c, Hein Putter, ProfPhD b, Carien L Creutzberg, ProfMD a
for the

PORTEC study group

  Members listed in the Supplementary Material

a Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands 
b Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands 
c Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands 
d Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK 
e Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
f Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy 
g NCIC-CTG, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, QC, Canada 
h Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France 
i Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands 
j Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK 
k Division of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
l Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lecco, Italy 
m NCIC-CTG, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada 
n Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France 
o Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 
p Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands 
q Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands 
r Comprehensive Cancer Center The Netherlands, Leiden, Netherlands 

* Correspondence to: Dr Stephanie M de Boer, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands Correspondence to: Dr Stephanie M de Boer Department of Radiation Oncology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden RC 2300 Netherlands

Summary

Background

About 15% of patients with endometrial cancer have high-risk features and are at increased risk of distant metastases and endometrial cancer-related death. We designed the PORTEC-3 trial to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer.

Methods

PORTEC-3 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, international trial. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly allocated (1:1) to radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy) in 1·8 Gy fractions five times a week or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles concurrent cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and four adjuvant cycles of carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2) using a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The primary endpoints of the PORTEC-3 trial were overall survival and failure-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This analysis focuses on 2-year toxicity and health-related quality of life as secondary endpoints; analysis was done according to treatment received. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) the cervix cancer module and chemotherapy and neuropathy subscales of the ovarian cancer module at baseline, after radiotherapy and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after randomisation. Adverse events were graded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual, and follow-up remains ongoing for the primary outcomes analysis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN.com, number ISRCTN14387080, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.

Findings

Between Sept 15, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were randomly allocated in the PORTEC-3 trial. Of these, 660 met eligibility criteria, and 570 (86%) were evaluable for health-related quality of life. Median follow-up was 42·3 months (IQR 25·8–55·1). At completion of radiotherapy and at 6 months, EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning scales were significantly lower (worse functioning) and health-related quality of life symptom scores higher (worse symptoms) for the chemoradiotherapy group compared with radiotherapy alone, improving with time. At 12 and 24 months, global health or quality of life was similar between groups, whereas physical functioning scores remained slightly lower in patients who received chemoradiotherapy compared with patients who received radiotherapy alone. At 24 months, 48 (25%) of 194 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group reported severe tingling or numbness compared with 11 (6%) of 170 patients in the radiotherapy alone group (p<0·0001). Grade 2 or worse adverse events were found during treatment in 309 (94%) of 327 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 145 (44%) of 326 patients in the radiotherapy alone group, and grade 3 or worse events were found in 198 (61%) of 327 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 42 (13%) of 326 patients in the radiotherapy alone group (p<0·0001), with most of the grade 3 adverse events being haematological (45%). At 12 and 24 months, no significant differences in grade 3 or worse adverse events were found between groups; only grade 2 or higher sensory neuropathy adverse events persisted at 24 months (25 [10%] of 240 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group vs one [<1%] of 247 patients in the radiotherapy alone group; p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Despite the increased physician and patient-reported toxicities, this schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer is feasible, with rapid recovery after treatment, but with persistence of patient-reported sensory neurological symptoms in 25% of patients. We await the analysis of primary endpoints before final conclusions are made.

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2016  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 8

P. 1114-1126 - août 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study
  • Daniela Bernardi, Petra Macaskill, Marco Pellegrini, Marvi Valentini, Carmine Fantò, Livio Ostillio, Paolina Tuttobene, Andrea Luparia, Nehmat Houssami
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus observation in patients with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma (QuiRedex): long-term follow-up of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
  • María-Victoria Mateos, Miguel-Teodoro Hernández, Pilar Giraldo, Javier de la Rubia, Felipe de Arriba, Lucía López Corral, Laura Rosiñol, Bruno Paiva, Luis Palomera, Joan Bargay, Albert Oriol, Felipe Prosper, Javier López, José-María Arguiñano, Nuria Quintana, José-Luis García, Joan Bladé, Juan-José Lahuerta, Jesús-F San Miguel

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.