S'abonner

Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial - 01/08/16

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30070-5 
Luca Incrocci, ProfMD a, , , Ruud C Wortel, MD a, , Wendimagegn Ghidey Alemayehu, PhD b, Shafak Aluwini, MD a, Erik Schimmel, MD c, Stijn Krol, MD d, Peter-Paul van der Toorn, MD e, Hanja de Jager, MD f, Wilma Heemsbergen, PhD g, Ben Heijmen, ProfPhD a, Floris Pos, MD g
a Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands 
b Clinical Trials Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands 
c Radiotherapy Group, Institute for Radiation Oncology, Arnhem, Netherlands 
d Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands 
e Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands 
f Radiotherapy Centre West, The Hague, Netherlands 
g Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands 

* Correspondence to: Prof Luca Incrocci, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands Correspondence to: Prof Luca Incrocci Department of Radiation Oncology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam EA 3075 Netherlands

Summary

Background

Studies have reported a low α/β ratio for prostate cancer, suggesting that hypofractionation could enhance the biological tumour dose without increasing genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. In the multicentre phase 3, HYpofractionated irradiation for PROstate cancer (HYPRO) trial, hypofractionated radiotherapy was compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for treatment of prostate cancer. We have previously reported acute and late incidence of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity; here we report protocol-defined 5-year relapse-free survival outcomes.

Methods

We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at seven Dutch radiotherapy centres. We enrolled patients with intermediate-risk to high-risk T1b–T4NX–N0MX–M0 localised prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen concentration of 60 μg/L or less, and a WHO performance status of 0–2. We used a web-based application to randomly assign (1:1) patients to either hypofractionated radiotherapy of 64·6 Gy (19 fractions of 3·4 Gy, three fractions per week) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy of 78·0 Gy (39 fractions of 2·0 Gy, five fractions per week). Based on an estimated α/β ratio for prostate cancer of 1·5 Gy, the equivalent total dose in fractions of 2·0 Gy was 90·4 Gy for hypofractionation compared with 78·0 Gy for conventional fractionation. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis in all eligible patients. The HYPRO trial completed recruitment in 2010 and follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN85138529.

Findings

Between March 19, 2007, and Dec 3, 2010, 820 patients were enrolled, of whom 804 were eligible and assessable for intention-to-treat analyses. Of these, 407 were assigned hypofractionated radiotherapy and 397 were allocated conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. 537 (67%) of 804 patients received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy for a median duration of 32 months (IQR 10–44). Median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 51–69). Treatment failure was reported in 169 (21%) of 804 patients, 80 (20%) in the hypofractionation group and 89 (22%) in the conventional fractionation group. 5-year relapse-free survival was 80·5% (95% CI 75·7–84·4) for patients assigned hypofractionation and 77·1% (71·9–81·5) for those allocated conventional fractionation (adjusted hazard radio 0·86, 95% CI 0·63–1·16; log-rank p=0·36). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Interpretation

Hypofractionated radiotherapy was not superior to conventional radiotherapy with respect to 5-year relapse-free survival. Our hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen cannot be regarded as the new standard of care for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer.

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2016  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 8

P. 1061-1069 - août 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
  • David Dearnaley, Isabel Syndikus, Helen Mossop, Vincent Khoo, Alison Birtle, David Bloomfield, John Graham, Peter Kirkbride, John Logue, Zafar Malik, Julian Money-Kyrle, Joe M O’Sullivan, Miguel Panades, Chris Parker, Helen Patterson, Christopher Scrase, John Staffurth, Andrew Stockdale, Jean Tremlett, Margaret Bidmead, Helen Mayles, Olivia Naismith, Chris South, Annie Gao, Clare Cruickshank, Shama Hassan, Julia Pugh, Clare Griffin, Emma Hall, CHHiP Investigators
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Zoledronate in combination with chemotherapy and surgery to treat osteosarcoma (OS2006): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial
  • Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Françoise Rédini, Hélène Pacquement, Perrine Marec-Bérard, Philippe Petit, Hervé Brisse, Cyril Lervat, Jean-Claude Gentet, Natacha Entz-Werlé, Antoine Italiano, Nadège Corradini, Emmanuelle Bompas, Nicolas Penel, Marie-Dominique Tabone, Anne Gomez-Brouchet, Jean-Marc Guinebretière, Eric Mascard, François Gouin, Aurélie Chevance, Naïma Bonnet, Jean-Yves Blay, Laurence Brugières, Sarcoma Group of UNICANCER, French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFCE), French Sarcoma Group (GSF-GETO)

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.