S'abonner

Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial - 01/08/16

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4 
David Dearnaley, ProfFRCR a, b, , Isabel Syndikus, MD c, Helen Mossop, MMathStat a, Vincent Khoo, MD a, b, Alison Birtle, FRCR d, David Bloomfield, FRCR e, John Graham, FRCR f, Peter Kirkbride, FRCR g, John Logue, FRCR h, Zafar Malik, FRCR c, Julian Money-Kyrle, FRCR i, Joe M O’Sullivan, ProfFRCR j, Miguel Panades, MRCR k, Chris Parker, FRCR a, b, Helen Patterson, FRCR l, , Christopher Scrase, FRCR m, John Staffurth, MD n, Andrew Stockdale, FRCR o, Jean Tremlett, MSc e, Margaret Bidmead, MSc b, Helen Mayles, MSc c, Olivia Naismith, MSc b, Chris South, PhD i, Annie Gao, MSc a, b, Clare Cruickshank, BSc[Hons] a, Shama Hassan, MSc a, Julia Pugh, CIM Dip a, Clare Griffin, MSc a, Emma Hall, PhD a
on behalf of the

CHHiP Investigators

a The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK 
b Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
c Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK 
d Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK 
e Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK 
f Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK 
g Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK 
h Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK 
i Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK 
j Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK 
k Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK 
l Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK 
m Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK 
n Cardiff University/Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK 
o University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof David Dearnaley, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK Correspondence to: Prof David Dearnaley The Institute of Cancer Research 15 Cotswold Road London SM2 5NG UK

Summary

Background

Prostate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity that would give a therapeutic advantage to hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned analysis of the efficacy and side-effects of a randomised trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy after 5 years follow-up.

Methods

CHHiP is a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial that recruited men with localised prostate cancer (pT1b–T3aN0M0). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to conventional (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) or one of two hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or 57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) all delivered with intensity-modulated techniques. Most patients were given radiotherapy with 3–6 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen suppression. Randomisation was by computer-generated random permuted blocks, stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group and radiotherapy treatment centre, and treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical or clinical failure; the critical hazard ratio (HR) for non-inferiority was 1·208. Analysis was by intention to treat. Long-term follow-up continues. The CHHiP trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN97182923.

Findings

Between Oct 18, 2002, and June 17, 2011, 3216 men were enrolled from 71 centres and randomly assigned (74 Gy group, 1065 patients; 60 Gy group, 1074 patients; 57 Gy group, 1077 patients). Median follow-up was 62·4 months (IQR 53·9–77·0). The proportion of patients who were biochemical or clinical failure free at 5 years was 88·3% (95% CI 86·0–90·2) in the 74 Gy group, 90·6% (88·5–92·3) in the 60 Gy group, and 85·9% (83·4–88·0) in the 57 Gy group. 60 Gy was non-inferior to 74 Gy (HR 0·84 [90% CI 0·68–1·03], pNI=0·0018) but non-inferiority could not be claimed for 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy (HR 1·20 [0·99–1·46], pNI=0·48). Long-term side-effects were similar in the hypofractionated groups compared with the conventional group. There were no significant differences in either the proportion or cumulative incidence of side-effects 5 years after treatment using three clinician-reported as well as patient-reported outcome measures. The estimated cumulative 5 year incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse bowel and bladder adverse events was 13·7% (111 events) and 9·1% (66 events) in the 74 Gy group, 11·9% (105 events) and 11·7% (88 events) in the 60 Gy group, 11·3% (95 events) and 6·6% (57 events) in the 57 Gy group, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Interpretation

Hypofractionated radiotherapy using 60 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to conventional fractionation using 74 Gy in 37 fractions and is recommended as a new standard of care for external-beam radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer.

Funding

Cancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2016  Dearnaley et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 8

P. 1047-1060 - août 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The C Word
  • Jocalyn Clark
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial
  • Luca Incrocci, Ruud C Wortel, Wendimagegn Ghidey Alemayehu, Shafak Aluwini, Erik Schimmel, Stijn Krol, Peter-Paul van der Toorn, Hanja de Jager, Wilma Heemsbergen, Ben Heijmen, Floris Pos

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.