S'abonner

Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial - 30/06/16

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30069-9 
Joan E Walter, BSc a, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, PhD a, Pim A de Jong, PhD e, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, ProfPhD a, b, Peter M A van Ooijen, PhD a, b, Robin B Peters, MD b, Kevin ten Haaf, MSc f, Uraujh Yousaf-Khan, MD f, Carlijn M van der Aalst, PhD f, Geertruida H de Bock, ProfPhD c, Willem Mali, ProfPhD e, Harry J M Groen, ProfPhD d, Harry J de Koning, ProfPhD f, Matthijs Oudkerk, ProfPhD a,
a University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging—North East Netherlands, Groningen, Netherlands 
b Department of Radiology, Groningen, Netherlands 
c Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, Netherlands 
d Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Groningen, Netherlands 
e University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Utrecht, Netherlands 
f Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands 

* Correspondence to: Prof Matthijs Oudkerk, Center for Medical Imaging—North East Netherlands, EB45, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands Center for Medical Imaging—North East Netherlands EB45 University Medical Center Groningen Groningen GZ 9713 Netherlands

Summary

Background

US guidelines now recommend lung cancer screening with low-dose CT for high-risk individuals. Reports of new nodules after baseline screening have been scarce and are inconsistent because of differences in definitions used. We aimed to identify the occurrence of new solid nodules and their probability of being lung cancer at incidence screening rounds in the Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NELSON).

Methods

In the ongoing, multicentre, randomised controlled NELSON trial, between Dec 23, 2003, and July 6, 2006, 15 822 participants who had smoked at least 15 cigarettes a day for more than 25 years or ten cigarettes a day for more than 30 years and were current smokers, or had quit smoking less than 10 years ago, were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either screening with low-dose CT (n=7915) or no screening (n=7907). From Jan 28, 2004, to Dec 18, 2006, 7557 individuals underwent baseline screening with low-dose CT; 7295 participants underwent second and third screening rounds. We included all participants with solid non-calcified nodules, registered by the NELSON radiologists as new or smaller than 15 mm3 (study detection limit) at previous screens. Nodule volume was generated semiautomatically by software. We calculated the maximum volume doubling time for nodules with an estimated percentage volume change of 25% or more, representing the minimum growth rate for the time since the previous scan. Lung cancer diagnosis was based on histology, and benignity was based on histology or stable size for at least 2 years. The NELSON trial is registered at trialregister.nl, number ISRCTN63545820.

Findings

We analysed data for participants with at least one solid non-calcified nodule at the second or third screening round. In the two incidence screening rounds, the NELSON radiologists registered 1222 new solid nodules in 787 (11%) participants. A new solid nodule was lung cancer in 49 (6%) participants with new solid nodules and, in total, 50 lung cancers were found, representing 4% of all new solid nodules. 34 (68%) lung cancers were diagnosed at stage I. Nodule volume had a high discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating curve 0·795 [95% CI 0·728–0·862]; p<0·0001). Nodules smaller than 27 mm3 had a low probability of lung cancer (two [0·5%] of 417 nodules; lung cancer probability 0·5% [95% CI 0·0–1·9]), nodules with a volume of 27 mm3 up to 206 mm3 had an intermediate probability (17 [3·1%] of 542 nodules; lung cancer probability 3·1% [1·9–5·0]), and nodules of 206 mm3 or greater had a high probability (29 [16·9%] of 172 nodules; lung cancer probability 16·9% [12·0–23·2]). A volume cutoff value of 27 mm3 or greater had more than 95% sensitivity for lung cancer.

Interpretation

Our study shows that new solid nodules are detected at each screening round in 5–7% of individuals who undergo screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT. These new nodules have a high probability of malignancy even at a small size. These findings should be considered in future screening guidelines, and new solid nodules should be followed up more aggressively than nodules detected at baseline screening.

Funding

Zorgonderzoek Nederland Medische Wetenschappen and Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds Kankerbestrijding.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2016  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 7

P. 907-916 - juillet 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Survival of European adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer in 2000–07: population-based data from EUROCARE-5
  • Annalisa Trama, Laura Botta, Roberto Foschi, Andrea Ferrari, Charles Stiller, Emmanuel Desandes, Milena Maria Maule, Franco Merletti, Gemma Gatta, EUROCARE-5 Working Group †
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
  • Toni K Choueiri, Bernard Escudier, Thomas Powles, Nizar M Tannir, Paul N Mainwaring, Brian I Rini, Hans J Hammers, Frede Donskov, Bruce J Roth, Katriina Peltola, Jae Lyun Lee, Daniel Y C Heng, Manuela Schmidinger, Neeraj Agarwal, Cora N Sternberg, David F McDermott, Dana T Aftab, Colin Hessel, Christian Scheffold, Gisela Schwab, Thomas E Hutson, Sumanta Pal, Robert J Motzer, METEOR investigators

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.