Safety and Efficacy of Bivalirudin in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From the REPLACE-2, ACUITY and HORIZONS-AMI Trials - 17/06/16
, Sameer Bansilal, MD, MS a, Frederick Feit, MD c, Michael Lincoff, MD d, Efthymios N. Deliargyris, MD e, Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, SM b, f, Philippe Généreux, MD b, f, g, Bjorn Redfors, MD, PhD b, Jayne Prats, PhD e, Debra Bernstein, PhD e, Sorin J. Brener, MD h, Simona Skerjanec, PharmD, MBA e, Alexandra J. Lansky, MD i, Dominic P. Francese, MPH b, George D. Dangas, MD, PhD a, b, Gregg W. Stone, MD b, fAbstract |
Optimal antithrombotic pharmacotherapy in patients affected by diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is unclear. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) in patients with DM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We pooled patient-level data from the Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events-2, Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy, and Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction trials. The primary efficacy end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 30 days. The primary safety end point was the incidence of 30-day non–coronary artery bypass graft-related major bleeding. All-cause mortality was reported at 30 days and 1 year. Of the 14,737 patients included in the pooled database, 3,641 (24.7%) had DM. Patients with DM had higher rates of 30-day major bleeding and 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. There were no differences in 30-day major adverse cardiac events between bivalirudin versus heparin plus GPI in patients with DM (6.9% vs 7.8%; relative risk [RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.12) or without DM (7.5% vs 6.7%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.27; pinteraction = 0.10). Bivalirudin treatment was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding in similar magnitude in patients with DM (4.3% vs 6.6% RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.89) or without DM (3.2% vs 6.1%; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.61; pinteraction = 0.15). The hemorrhagic benefit of bivalirudin was noted for both access site- and non–access site-related bleeding. Overall, bivalirudin treatment was associated with a significant 1-year mortality benefit (2.7% vs 3.3%; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98; p = 0.03), which was consistent between patients with or without DM (pinteraction = 0.30). In conclusion, compared with heparin plus GPI, bivalirudin was associated with similar 30-day antithrombotic efficacy and better 30-day freedom from bleeding and 1-year mortality, irrespective of diabetic status.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00093158 (ACUITY); NCT00433966 (HORIZONS-AMI). |
|
| See page 14 for disclosure information. |
Vol 118 - N° 1
P. 6-16 - juillet 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Comparison of Noninvasively and Invasively Managed Patients, With or Without Revascularization in Non–ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey)
- Alex Blatt, Eran Kalmanovich, Orit Karny-Rahkovich, Svetlana Brener, Meital Shlezinger, Nir Shlomo, Zvi Vered, Hanoch Hod, Ilan Goldenberg, Gabby Elbaz-Greener
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation for Previous Myocardial Infarction
- Mineok Chang, Cheol Whan Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Rafael Cavalcante, Yohei Sotomi, Yoshinobu Onuma, Yaping Zeng, Duk-Woo Park, Soo-Jin Kang, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Seong-Wook Park, Patrick W. Serruys, Seung-Jung Park
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?