S'abonner

Cost-effectiveness and programmatic benefits of maternal vaccination against pertussis in England - 10/06/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.04.012 
Albert Jan van Hoek a, , Helen Campbell b, Gayatri Amirthalingam b, Nick Andrews c, Elizabeth Miller b
a Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, United Kingdom 
b Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, England, United Kingdom 
c Statistics and Modelling Unit, Public Health England, London, England, United Kingdom 

Corresponding author. Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT London, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 0 20 7927 2761.Keppel StreetLondonWC1E 7HTUnited Kingdom

Summary

Background

Maternal pertussis immunisation was introduced during the pertussis resurgence in England in 2012 as a temporary measure to protect infants too young to be vaccinated. The programme was shown to be safe and highly effective. However, continuation of maternal vaccination as a routine programme requires a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Method

The estimated prevented disease burden among mothers and their infants was obtained assuming 89% (95% CI: 19%–99%) vaccine efficacy for mothers and 91% (95% CI: 84%–95%) for infants. Future incidence was projected based on the disease rates in 2010–2012, including the four-year cycle of low and high incidence years. Full probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed for different scenarios.

Results

Assuming a vaccine coverage of 60%, there were 1650 prevented hospitalisations in infants (3.5% discounting, the first 10 years), including 55–60 deaths and ∼20,500 cases among mothers, of which around 1800 would be severe. The annual costs of the programme are £7.3 million assuming a price of £10 per dose and £9.4 million assuming £15 per dose. Using discounting of 3.5%, a 200 year time horizon and a price of £10 per dose (+£7.5 administration costs) only 25% of the iterations were below £30,000 per QALY. Using a 35% higher incidence resulted in 88% of the scenarios below this threshold. Assuming that the incidence remains at the level at the height of 2012, then the programme would be highly cost effective, with an ICER of £16,865 (£12,209–£25,976; price of £10 and 3.5%/3.5% discounting).

Conclusion

Maternal vaccination is effective in preventing severe illness and deaths in infants but the cost-effectiveness of the programme is highly dependent on future incidence which is necessarily uncertain. However, the duration and magnitude of protection against transmission afforded by the current acellular vaccines is also uncertain as are the associated effects on future herd immunity. The direct protection offered by the maternal dose provides the only certain way of protecting vulnerable infants from birth.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Maternal pertussis vaccination is highly effective at preventing infant deaths.
Its cost-effectiveness as an adjunct to paediatric vaccination needs evaluation.
Future pertussis incidence is the major determinant of cost-effectiveness.
The ability of acellular vaccines to control transmission is questionable.
Given this uncertainty continuation of maternal immunisation is advisable.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Pertussis, Maternal vaccination, Cost-effectiveness, Policymaking, Programmatic considerations


Plan


Crown Copyright © 2016  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 73 - N° 1

P. 28-37 - juillet 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Neurological sequelae of bacterial meningitis
  • Marjolein J. Lucas, Matthijs C. Brouwer, Diederik van de Beek
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Seroprevalence of pertussis among adults in China where whole cell vaccines have been used for 50 years
  • Zhiyun Chen, Jing Zhang, Lina Cao, Nan Zhang, Junping Zhu, Guoling Ping, Jianhong Zhao, Shuming Li, Qiushui He

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.