Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing various niches of the human body - 20/05/16

Summary |
Objectives |
As individuals may be colonized with multiple strains of Staphylococcus aureus at different body sites, the objectives of this study were to determine whether S. aureus polyclonal colonization exists within one body niche and the optimal sampling sites and culture methodology to capture the diversity of S. aureus strains in community-dwelling individuals.
Methods |
Swabs were collected from the nares, axillae, and inguinal folds of 3 children with community-associated S. aureus infections and 11 household contacts, all with known S. aureus colonization. S. aureus isolates were recovered from each body niche using 4 culture methods and evaluated for polyclonality using phenotypic and genotypic strain characterization methodologies.
Results |
Within individuals, the mean (range) number of phenotypes and genotypes was 2.4 (1–4) and 3.1 (1–6), respectively. Six (43%) and 10 (71%) participants exhibited phenotypic and genotypic polyclonality within one body niche, respectively. Broth enrichment yielded the highest analytical sensitivity for S. aureus recovery, while direct plating to blood agar yielded the highest genotypic strain diversity.
Conclusions |
This study revealed S. aureus polyclonality within a single body niche. Culture methodology and sampling sites influenced the analytical sensitivity of S. aureus colonization detection and the robustness of phenotypic and genotypic strain recovery.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | S. aureus polyclonality was assessed by phenotypic and genotypic methods. |
• | Polyclonality existed within a single body niche in community-dwelling individuals. |
• | Inclusion of broth enrichment increased recovery of S. aureus isolates. |
• | Sampling multiple body niches increased recovery and diversity of S. aureus isolates. |
Keywords : Staphylococcus aureus, Polyclonal colonization, Strain diversity, Broth enrichment
Plan
Vol 72 - N° 6
P. 698-705 - juin 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?