Use of a simplified frailty index to predict Clavien 4 complications and mortality after hepatectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database - 15/05/16
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Abstract |
Background |
An aging surgical population places an increasing burden on surgeons to accurately risk stratify and counsel patients. Preoperative frailty assessments are a promising new modality to better evaluate patients but can often be time consuming. Data regarding frailty and hepatectomy outcomes have not been published to date.
Method |
Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database, we examined hepatectomy patients 2005 to 11 and correlated frailty scores with outcomes of major morbidity, mortality, and extended length of stay, using a previously validated modified frailty index score. Frailty was compared against age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and other common risk variables.
Results |
Multivariate regression identified frailty as the strongest predictor of Clavien 4 complications (OR = 40.0, 95% CI = 15.2 to 105.0), and mortality (OR = 26.4, 95% CI = 7.7 to 88.2). As the frailty score increased, there was a statistically significant increase in Clavien 4 complications, mortality, and extended length of stay (P < .001 for all).
Conclusions |
Frailty is a significant factor in morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. Use of the modified frailty index allows for feasibility of data collection in a busy clinical setting.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | We examined frailty and outcomes in 10,300 hepatectomies from the NSQIP database. |
• | Frailty contributes to serious morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. |
• | Frailty is more significant than other commonly assessed risk factors. |
• | A modified frailty index simplifies assessment in a clinical setting. |
Keywords : Hepatectomy, Frailty, National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, Frailty index, Clavien 4
Plan
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 211 - N° 6
P. 1071-1076 - juin 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?