S'abonner

Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients with cancer receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority study - 03/03/16

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00520-3 
Gábor Kovács, DrMD a, , Antonio E Wachtel, MD b, Elena V Basharova, MD c, Tulla Spinelli, PhD d, Pierre Nicolas, DPharm d, Edita Kabickova, MD e
a Second Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary 
b Department of Pediatrics, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru 
c Oncohematology Center, Chelyabinsk Pediatric Regional Clinical Hospital, Chelyabinsk, Russia 
d Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland 
e Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic 

* Correspondence to: Dr Gábor Kovács, Second Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1094, Hungary Second Department of Pediatrics Semmelweis University Budapest 1094 Hungary

Summary

Background

Palonosetron has shown efficacy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults undergoing moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of palonosetron versus ondansetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients.

Methods

In this multicentre, multinational, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study, paediatric patients aged between 0 and younger than 17 years, who were naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, and scheduled to undergo moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant disease were randomised centrally (1:1:1) to receive up to four cycles of 10 μg/kg or 20 μg/kg palonosetron on day 1, or three 150 μg/kg doses of ondansetron on day 1, scheduled 4 h apart, according to a static central permuted block randomisation scheme by an interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified according to age and emetogenicity. Treatment allocation was masked to project team members involved in data collection and analysis, and members of the investigator’s team. The primary endpoint was complete response (no vomiting, retching, or use of rescue drugs) during the acute phase (0–24 h post-chemotherapy) of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle, as assessed in the population of randomly assigned patients who received moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and an active study drug. The primary efficacy objective was to show the non-inferiority of palonosetron versus ondansetron during the acute phase (0–24 h post-chemotherapy) of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle through comparison of the difference in the proportions of patients who achieved a complete response with palonosetron (πT) minus ondansetron (πR) versus a preset non-inferiority margin (δ −15%). To be considered as non-inferior to ondansetron, for at least one of the doses of palonosetron, the lower limit of the 97·5% CI for the weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates had to be superior to −15%. Safety was assessed, according to treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01442376, and has been completed.

Findings

Between Sept 12, 2011, and Oct 26, 2012, we randomly assigned 502 patients; 169 were assigned to receive 10 μg/kg palonosetron, 169 to receive 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and 164 to receive 3 × 150 μg/kg ondansetron, of whom 166, 165, and 162, respectively, were included in the efficacy analysis. In the acute phase, complete responses were recorded in 90 (54%) patients in the 10 μg/kg palonosetron group, 98 (59%) in the 20 μg/kg palonosetron group, and 95 (59%) in the ondansetron group. Non-inferiority versus ondansetron was shown for 20 μg/kg palonosetron in the acute phase (weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates 0·36% [97·5% CI −11·7 to 12·4]; p=0·0022). Non-inferiority versus ondansetron was not shown for 10 μg/kg palonosetron in the acute phase (weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates −4·41% [97·5% CI −16·4 to 7·6]). In the first on-study treatment cycle, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 134 (80%) of 167 patients who received 10 μg/kg palonosetron, 113 (69%) of 163 who received 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and 134 (82%) of 164 who received ondansetron. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were nervous system disorders, mainly headache, which occurred in three (2%) patients who received 10 μg/kg palonosetron, one (<1%) patient who received 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and two (1%) patients who received ondansetron. The incidence of serious adverse events in the first on-study treatment cycle was lower in the 20 μg/kg palonosetron group (43 [26%]) than in the 10 μg/kg palonosetron group (52 [31%]) and the ondansetron group (55 [34%]).

Interpretation

Non-inferiority was shown for 20 μg/kg palonosetron during the acute phase of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle. 20 μg/kg palonosetron is now indicated by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients aged 1 month to younger than 17 years.

Funding

Helsinn Healthcare.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2016  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 3

P. 332-344 - mars 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Lenalidomide versus investigator’s choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL-002; SPRINT): a phase 2, randomised, multicentre trial
  • Marek Trn?ný, Thierry Lamy, Jan Walewski, David Belada, Jiri Mayer, John Radford, Wojciech Jurczak, Franck Morschhauser, Julia Alexeeva, Simon Rule, Boris Afanasyev, Kamil Kaplanov, Antoine Thyss, Alexej Kuzmin, Sergey Voloshin, Kazimierz Kuliczkowski, Agnieszka Giza, Noel Milpied, Caterina Stelitano, Reinhard Marks, Lorenz Trümper, Tsvetan Biyukov, Meera Patturajan, Marie-Laure Casadebaig Bravo, Luca Arcaini, SPRINT trial investigators and in collaboration with the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto—GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial
  • Michael Untch, Christian Jackisch, Andreas Schneeweiss, Bettina Conrad, Bahriye Aktas, Carsten Denkert, Holger Eidtmann, Hermann Wiebringhaus, Sherko Kümmel, Jörn Hilfrich, Mathias Warm, Stefan Paepke, Marianne Just, Claus Hanusch, John Hackmann, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Michael Clemens, Silvia Darb-Esfahani, Wolfgang Daniel Schmitt, Serban Dan Costa, Bernd Gerber, Knut Engels, Valentina Nekljudova, Sibylle Loibl, Gunter von Minckwitz, German Breast Group (GBG), Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie—Breast (AGO-B) Investigators

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.