S'abonner

The Efficacy of Movement Representation Techniques for Treatment of Limb Pain—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - 01/02/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.015 
Holm Thieme , , Nadine Morkisch , §, Christian Rietz , Christian Dohle , §, Bernhard Borgetto
 Faculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hildesheim, Germany 
 First European School for Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy, Clinic Bavaria Kreischa, Kreischa, Germany 
 MEDIAN Clinic Berlin-Kladow, Berlin, Germany 
§ Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany 
 Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany 

Address reprint requests to Dr. Holm Thieme, PhD, Faculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Goschentor 1, Hildesheim 31134, Germany.Faculty of Social Work and HealthUniversity of Applied Sciences and ArtsGoschentor 1Hildesheim31134Germany

Abstract

Relatively new evidence suggests that movement representation techniques (ie, therapies that use the observation and/or imagination of normal pain-free movements, such as mirror therapy, motor imagery, or movement and/or action observation) might be effective in reduction of some types of limb pain. To summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy of those techniques, a systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, PsychINFO, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and OT-seeker up to August 2014 and hand-searched further relevant resources for randomized controlled trials that studied the efficacy of movement representation techniques in reduction of limb pain. The outcomes of interest were pain, disability, and quality of life. Study selection and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. We included 15 trials on the effects of mirror therapy, (graded) motor imagery, and action observation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb pain, poststroke pain, and nonpathological (acute) pain. Overall, movement representation techniques were found to be effective in reduction of pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −.82, 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.32 to −.31, P = .001) and disability (SMD = .72, 95% CI, .22–1.22, P = .004) and showed a positive but nonsignificant effect on quality of life (SMD = 2.61, 85% CI, −3.32 to 8.54, P = .39). Especially mirror therapy and graded motor imagery should be considered for the treatment of patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Furthermore, the results indicate that motor imagery could be considered as a potential effective treatment in patients with acute pain after trauma and surgery. To date, there is no evidence for a pain reducing effect of movement representation techniques in patients with phantom limb pain and poststroke pain other than complex regional pain syndrome.

Perspective

In this systematic review we synthesize the evidence for the efficacy of movement representation techniques (ie, motor imagery, mirror therapy, or action observation) for treatment of limb pain. Our findings suggest effective pain reduction in some types of limb pain. Further research should address specific questions on the optimal type and dose of therapy.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

We systematically reviewed the effects of movement representation on limb pain.
Overall, observation and imagination of movements reduced limb pain and disability.
We found good evidence for mirror therapy and motor imagery.
We found no evidence for phantom limb pain and poststroke pain.
Major limitations were small number of trials and sample sizes, and heterogeneity.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Movement representation techniques, motor imagery, action observation, mirror therapy, limb pain, complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb pain, poststroke pain


Plan


 Christian Dohle and Bernhard Borgetto share last authorship.
 This study was financially supported by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research Germany (01KG1212) and the ZVK Foundation for the promotion of research in physiotherapy.
 Christian Dohle is first author of 1 included study. He was not involved in data extraction and methodological rating of this study. Christian Rietz is coauthor of 1 included study. He was not involved in data extraction and methodological rating of this study.
 All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


© 2016  American Pain Society. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 2

P. 167-180 - février 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Research Gaps in Practice Guidelines for Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Adults: Findings From a Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline
  • Debra B. Gordon, Oscar A. de Leon-Casasola, Christopher L. Wu, Kathleen A. Sluka, Timothy J. Brennan, Roger Chou
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • GABAA Receptors in the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala Are Involved in Pain- and Itch-Related Responses
  • Long Chen, Wei Wang, Tao Tan, Huili Han, Zhifang Dong

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.