Distal Ureteric Stones and Tamsulosin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Trial - 19/12/15
Abstract |
Study objective |
We assess the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin compared with placebo as medical expulsive therapy in patients with distal ureteric stones less than or equal to 10 mm in diameter.
Methods |
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of adult participants with calculus on computed tomography (CT). Patients were allocated to 0.4 mg of tamsulosin or placebo daily for 28 days. The primary outcomes were stone expulsion on CT at 28 days and time to stone expulsion.
Results |
There were 403 patients randomized, 81.4% were men, and the median age was 46 years. The median stone size was 4.0 mm in the tamsulosin group and 3.7 mm in the placebo group. Of 316 patients who received CT at 28 days, stone passage occurred in 140 of 161 (87.0%) in the tamsulosin group and 127 of 155 (81.9%) with placebo, a difference of 5.0% (95% confidence interval –3.0% to 13.0%). In a prespecified subgroup analysis of large stones (5 to 10 mm), 30 of 36 (83.3%) tamsulosin participants had stone passage compared with 25 of 41 (61.0%) with placebo, a difference of 22.4% (95% confidence interval 3.1% to 41.6%) and number needed to treat of 4.5. There was no difference in urologic interventions, time to self-reported stone passage, pain, or analgesia requirements. Adverse events were generally mild and did not differ between groups.
Conclusion |
We found no benefit overall of 0.4 mg of tamsulosin daily for patients with distal ureteric calculi less than or equal to 10 mm in terms of spontaneous passage, time to stone passage, pain, or analgesia requirements. In the subgroup with large stones (5 to 10 mm), tamsulosin did increase passage and should be considered.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page 87 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: Allan B. Wolfson, MD |
|
Author contributions: JSF, KC, and JG conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. JSF, KC, CB, GK, OT, TT, and CD supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection, undertook recruitment of participants, and managed the data, including quality control. JG provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. JSF drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. JSF had full access to all the study data and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. JSF takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist and provided the following details: Supported by a grant from the Queensland Emergency Medicine Research Foundation. |
|
Clinical trial registration number: ACTRN12610000623099 |
|
CSL Biotherapies had no involvement in study initiation, design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or article writing. |
|
A 3KKR52J survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 67 - N° 1
P. 86 - janvier 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?