The Prevalence of Bruising Among Infants in Pediatric Emergency Departments - 19/12/15
Abstract |
Study objective |
Bruising can indicate abuse for infants. Bruise prevalence among infants in the pediatric emergency department (ED) setting is unknown. Our objective is to determine prevalence of bruising, associated chief complaints, and frequency of abuse evaluations in previously healthy infants presenting to pediatric EDs.
Methods |
We conducted a prospective, observational, multicenter study of infants aged 12 months or younger presenting to pediatric EDs. Structured sampling was used. Pediatric emergency medicine clinicians performed complete skin examinations to screen for bruising. Study investigators documented skin findings, date of visit, patient’s age, chief complaint, and abuse evaluation. The primary outcome was prevalence of bruising. Secondary outcomes were prevalence of bruising based on chief complaint and frequency of abuse evaluation. Point estimates of bruise prevalence and differences in bruise prevalence between patient subgroups were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results |
Bruising was identified in 88 of 2,488 infants (3.5%; 95% CI 2.9% to 4.4%). Rates of bruising for infants 5 months and younger and older than 5 months were 1.3% and 6.4%, respectively (difference 5.1%; 95% CI 3.6% to 6.8%). For infants 5 months and younger, 83% of bruising was associated with a trauma chief complaint and only 0.2% of infants presenting with a medical chief complaint had bruising. Pediatric emergency medicine clinicians obtained abuse evaluations on 23% of infants with bruising, and that rate increased to 50% for infants 5 months and younger.
Conclusion |
Bruising prevalence in children 12 months and younger who were evaluated in pediatric EDs was low, increased within age strata, and was most often associated with a trauma chief complaint. Most bruised infants did not undergo an abuse evaluation.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page 2 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: David M. Jaffe, MD |
|
Author contributions: MCP obtained funding. MCP, JNM, KK, DJL, GM, and BLB designed the study. MCP, KK, BLB, and JTK supervised the conduct of the study. JNM and GM were responsible for data collection. MCP, JNM, KK, DJL, and JTK analyzed and interpreted the data. DJL was responsible for the statistical analysis. MCP and JNM were responsible for the initial article draft, and all authors contributed to the revisions for the final version. All authors made critical intellectual contributions and approved the final article as submitted. MCP takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. MCP and JNM share first authorship of this work. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist and provided the following details: This research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (R01HD060997 to Dr. Pierce). |
|
A F6XWTQJ survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 67 - N° 1
P. 1-8 - janvier 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?