Long-term use of benzodiazepines: Definitions, prevalence and usage patterns – a systematic review of register-based studies - 18/11/15
, L.K. Saastamoinen c, S. Tähkäpää b, A. Tuulio-Henriksson c, T. Taiminen a, J. Tiihonen d, e, M.S. Airaksinen b, J. Hietala aBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 11 |
| Iconographies | 3 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Abstract |
Background |
Numerous treatment guidelines recommend that long-term use of benzodiazepines (BZD) should be avoided primarily due to development of tolerance and a risk for BZD dependence. Despite this, long-term BZD use remains a controversial subject in clinical patient care with “for and against” debates. However, there is no explicit understanding of what is meant by long-term BZD use in real world. The aim of this study was to assess different definitions, usage patterns, prevalence and other characteristics of long-term BZD use based on published register-based studies. Synthesis of these characteristics is essential to derive a meaningful definition of long-term BZD.
Methods |
Systematic review of register-based studies on long-term BZD use published in 1994–2014.
Results |
Fourty-one studies met our predetermined inclusion criteria. The length of BZD use defined as “long-term” varied in these studies ranging from one month to several years. The most common definition was six months or longer during a year. The prevalence of long-term BZD use in the general population was estimated to be about 3%. The relative proportion of long-term BZD users (all definitions) in adult BZD users ranged from 6% to 76% (mean 24%; 95% CL 13–36%). The estimates were higher in studies only on the elderly (47%; 95% CL 31–64%). Long-term use involved typically steady treatment with low BZD doses. However, in elderly patients long-term BZD use and exceeding recommended doses was relatively common. Several characteristics associated with long-term use were found.
Conclusions |
Long-term BZD use is common and a clinical reality. Uniform definitions for “long-term”, which is in line with population-based evidence, is needed to have more comparable results between studies. Our systematic review suggests that duration of BZD treatment over six months, the most common definition for long-term BZD use in the included studies. As also recommended previously, it is a useful starting point for further analyses on disadvantages but also potential advantages associated with long-term BZD use.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Benzodiazepines, Long-term, Use, Systematic review, Anxiolytics, Hypnotics
Plan
Vol 30 - N° 8
P. 1037-1047 - novembre 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- The effectiveness of a program of physical activity and diet to modify cardiovascular risk factors in patients with severe mental illness after 3-month follow-up: CAPiCOR randomized clinical trial
- R. Masa-Font, M.I. Fernández-San-Martín, L.M. Martín López, A.M. Alba Muñoz, S. Oller Canet, J. Martín Royo, L. San Emeterio Echevarría, N. Olona Tabueña, M. Ibarra Jato, A. Barroso García, S. González Tejón, C. Tajada Vitales, B. Díaz Mújica, L. Viñas Cabrera, R. Sanchís Catalán, T. Salvador Barbarroja
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?