The Skin Cancer Objective Structured Clinical Examination (SCOSCE): A multi-institutional collaboration to develop and validate a clinical skills assessment for melanoma - 12/11/15
Submitted on behalf of the
Integrated Skin Exam Consortium
Abstract |
Background |
Assessing medical students on core skills related to melanoma detection is challenging in the absence of a well-developed instrument.
Objective |
We sought to develop an objective structured clinical examination for the detection and evaluation of melanoma among medical students.
Methods |
This was a prospective cohort analysis of student and objective rater agreement on performance of clinical skills and assessment of differences in performance across 3 schools.
Results |
Kappa coefficients indicated excellent agreement for 3 of 5 core skills including commenting on the presence of the moulage (k = 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.96), obtaining a history for the moulage (k = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.94), and making a clinical impression (k = 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.92). There were no differences in performance across schools with respect to 3 of 5 core skills: commenting on the presence of the moulage (P = .15), initiating a history (P = .53), and managing the suspicious lesion (P value range .07-.17). Overall, 54.2% and 44.7% of students commented on the presence of the moulage and achieved maximum performance of core skills, respectively, with no difference in performance across schools.
Limitations |
Limitations include overall sample size of students and schools.
Conclusion |
The Skin Cancer Objective Structured Clinical Examination represents a potentially important instrument to measure students' performance on the optimal step-by-step evaluation of a melanoma.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : cancer, curriculum, dermatology, education, examination, medical, Objective Structured Clinical Examination, skin, student, undergraduate
Abbreviations used : CI, OSCE, SCOSCE
Plan
Supported by Harry J. Lloyd Charitable Trust. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. |
|
Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
Vol 73 - N° 6
P. 959-965 - décembre 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?